Here we go again. About two weeks ago, maybe one, a writer with ESPN's page 2 crowned Kobe as a MUCH better ball player than Michael Jordan. The writer, Jemele Hill, has great skills as far as her pen is concerned, but she's a chick and must be under 35. Why? Because today's NBA sucks when compared to yesterday's and the players arent, as people wish, bigger, better and faster.
BUT NOW IT GETS WORSE. Because, ya see, when a woman steps up and starts saying things about the skill level in a sport like the NBA, well, just turn on the WNBA and you'll see why its not really possible for a chick to truly grasp NBA talent... But at the same time, while she's "ranting" its possible for YOU to do what most guys do when chicks start opening their mouths and speaking with authority on anything except menstruation .. you can just not hear her.. BUT WHAT ABOUT A MAN....
YES
Yet ANOTHER writer has hailed today's NBA as better than yesterday in view of the actual players. MICHAEL VENTRE states in a recent article "athletes across the league are far superior overall than they were in Wilt’s day, when defenses are more sophisticated, when scouting is more meticulous, when travel is more arduous (well, there’s more of it to more cities, but of course, the comfort level is far better now than back in the day) and when the pressure is higher than ever because of television and huge salaries."
To quote BORAT "Whuuuuuut!" How can both of these people be this dumb with regard to the league? Where does the brainwashing start and end. Are these writers serious? Is Ventre really a lady???
Where is PROFESSOR NBA?
